
Why do 90% of the population take an interest in para psychological phenomena, but science and academia chooses mostly to ignore it?
Many people believe that "PSI" is just superstitious nonsense. Others believe that their experiences are consistent enough to warrant further investigation and make them into believers. The skeptics hit back by saying that their are "trillions of experiences in the world, and the select few which make news are not normal". Yet, when these things are test empirically - they cannot be ignored.
In popular culture this is talked about a great deal - it is a compelling topic. But for a scientist to study it, is a TABOO. This may be because TABOO in science restricts inquiry, and restricts what ideas are acceptable. A TABOO in science is where informed consensus is constrained, and science rests on informed consensus. All this means is that this TABOO is sustained, as has been the case for hundreds of years.
But here is the thing. There have been four studies done on science (which are disclosed), they were 1981, Congressional Research Science; 1985, Army Research Institute; 1987, National Research Council and 1989 Office of Technology Assessment. All four of them concluded, something interesting was going on and further investigation was necessary. This research included skeptics.
In 1995, a review of "remote viewing" evidence for CIA (1995) resulted in conclusions such as: "Using standards applied to any other area of science, it is concluded that psychic functioning has been well established", while a skeptic who oversaw the study remarked "..free of methodological weaknesses ..effect sizes ..are too large and consistent to be dismissed as statistical flukes..".
Dean Radin - the renowned scientist and expert from Institute of Noetic Sciences - recently was invited to the world's largest technology company - Google - to educate their employees on intuition and para psychological phenomena.
Something interesting is going on..
Click here to watch Dean speaking about science and parapsychology at Google's headquarters

Dean Radin, PhD, is Senior Scientist at the Institute of Noetic Sciences (IONS). His first career as a concert violinist shifted into science after earning a masters degree in electrical engineering and a PhD in psychology from the University of Illinois, Champaign-Urbana. Before joining the research staff at IONS, he held appointments at Princeton University, University of Edinburgh, University of Nevada, and three Silicon Valley think-tanks where he worked on a classified program investigating psychic phenomena for the US government. He is an author of over 200 articles, a dozen book chapters, and several books including the bestselling The Conscious Universe and Entangled Minds. He has been interviewed for television shows ranging from Oprah and Larry King Live, to the BBC’s Horizon and PBS's Closer to Truth, and he has presented over a hundred invited lectures in venues including Harvard, St



I'm very interested in what you are talking about but unfortunate I have no money to buy your products.
it pains me to skip your discussion but I got now cold cash for the products being offered.
Jim
the url for Dean Radin doesn't work.
I decided to have the experience myself and then decide what it means to me and how significant it is if I should be able to accomplish this whole psi experience. I spent 10 years learning, experimenting on my own psi abilities and now am able to produce results which are beyond chance, over and over again. I had the courage to cross the taboo lines and do diligence with this subject. I am so very grateful to Dean and others who paved the way for my incredible successes by their dedication, their courage to do cross the taboo lines and the powerful message being shared here for those who truly desire to see for themselves instead of letting others decide for them what is and what is not real here. Thanks Dean.
I don't know what "science" you are referring to. Nothing is taboo for a scientist to research, but funding can be a problem. your title implies that 90% of the population is saying something to "science" . Hmmm, The scientific community is international and widely varied in opinions and research interests. Is 90% of the world really interested in a scientific study of PSI powers? I really don't think so. 90% of any group agreeing on (almost) any subject is next to impossible. Even if 90% of Americans believe that psi powers existed, I doubt that the same 90% would be interested in a scientific study enough to financially support it. I get annoyed at articles like this, because they put a bad name to science, and by association, research into psi.
I am a believer alas I'm feeling the financial recession.